A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such spots are matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, Based on sworn proof referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has because come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water during critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter if interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and ailments attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private check out, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Place of Conservation and say that all is effective are already carried out based upon Expert assistance and René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 accepted plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into The ocean during a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over building of wall at coastal internet site happens to be a shorthand description to get a circumstance a large number of observers see as increasingly typical. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become more contentious.
The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier famous the businessman had previously been involved in local advocacy on planning and environmental problems, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty distinctive Qualified backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-high h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both the Bodily truth in the coastline as well as symbolic nature with the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays unsure. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside together with one another extended once the authorized expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Regardless of whether it can finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.