A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their relatives property. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their organizing permission by creating a wall past the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, particularly in a very sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, wherever views of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic initiatives from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-high h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image that has due to the fact grow to be emblematic from the intensity on the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof with the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Just about the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated in detail by the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard more submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the core in the dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as built, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few basically trying to develop a family residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Skilled tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much method.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up disorders. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.